Introduction
Zoonotic illnesses have caused countless epidemics over the years that have killed millions of people. The recent COVID-19 pandemic is excellent evidence of this. Like the coronavirus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome, the Nipah virus is also fatal and has been responsible for several outbreaks in recent years. Recent years have seen several epidemics and pandemics brought on by the H1N1 virus subtype, coronaviruses that cause the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), A(H5N1) virus, Asian Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), Rift Valley Fever (RVF), Lassa fever, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), Marburg, Hendra and Nipah virus (NiV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Ebola and Influenza. High morbidity and mortality rates were a defining feature of these epidemics, which primarily affected underdeveloped and developing nations in Asia, Africa, and South America [1,2]. The increasing prevalence of these infectious diseases and the subsequent spread of those diseases have had a profound impact on economics and public health around the world. The emergence of NiV diseases become a serious threat for mammals. The WHO has declared NiV infection as a research and development priority considering no vaccines or therapies are available for this lethal condition [3,4].
Epidemiology
Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus are two zoonotic members of the genus Henipaviruses, which belong to the family Paramyxoviridae. HeV, first identified in Australia in 1994, caused a severe respiratory outbreak with extensive mortality in horses [5,6]. Several cases of HeV infection in horses were subsequently documented in Australia, characterized by notable human transmission and high mortality rates [6-8]. NiV was first recognized as a human pathogen in Peninsular Malaysia in 1998. The outbreak, linked to severe encephalitic illness, resulted in a high mortality rate among pig farmers and slaughterhouse workers exposed to infected swine fluids [9,10]. Negatively polarized single-stranded RNA is present in the Nipah virus. RNA viruses have a higher likelihood of infecting novel host species because of their incredibly rapid evolution and low generation times [11,12]. NiV is a rare but potentially hazardous virus that is to blame for high fatality rates of between 40 -75% [4].
The initial NiV outbreak in Malaysia-Singapore (1998-1999) was initially mistaken for Japanese encephalitis but was later accurately identified [6,13]. In 2001, another NiV outbreak occurred in separate locations: the Meherpur district of Bangladesh and Siliguri in West Bengal, India [14].
Transmission
Fruit bats, often known as megabats and belonging to the Pteropodidae family, especially those from the Pteropus genus, are the natural hosts of NiV. The fruit bats that transfer the virus most frequently are flying foxes, either directly to susceptible species, such as humans, or indirectly through infected fruits (or sap) or biological bat matrices (such as urine or faeces) [4].
Natural NiV transmission can occur between individuals of the same species (humans and pigs) as well as between individuals of different species (flying bats, pigs, and horses). Bovine species are believed to be susceptible to NiV, while ruminants serve as spillover hosts, with confirmed NiV infections in ovine-caprine animals. Although dogs and cats are both capable of contracting the NiV virus, they do not appear to have any zoonotic potential [15]. Human-to-human transmission is a major source of disease and a possible public health threat.
Differential Characteristics of Outbreaks
In terms of transmission, clinical traits, and death rates, the Indo-Bangladesh outbreaks were significantly distinct from Malaysia's. It was primarily marked by human-to-human and nosocomial transmissions. The illness was more severe and progressed swiftly compared to Malaysia's, with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), respiratory failure, and multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), along with neurological symptoms, likely causing higher fatalities [14].
Additionally, the strains (BD vs. MY) were blamed for the disparate transmission rates. According to a study, the BD strain in ferrets caused increased RNA levels and more oral