Abstract
Tuberculosis is a chronic infectious disease caused by bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. We propose to collate and synthesize various facilitators and barriers to tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in India by adopting a method of qualitative evidence synthesis. The protocol has been prepared adhering to the PRISMA-P guidelines. Primary studies on qualitative research and mixed methods on diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in India which are published in India from January 2000 to January 31st 2025 in English will be included. Two pass two stage screening will be adopted, with adjudication by third reviewer. Electronic databases such as MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web of Science, ProQuest will be searched, along with gray literature. We will be scoping the website of Central TB division as a source of grey literature. We will be using Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist which is based on ten criteria for thematic synthesis of studies. We will be importing the findings to suitable data analysis software. We will be presenting the findings as narratives, categories and themes recovered from primary studies in Qualitative Meta-synthesis. The written synthesis of qualitative research will follow “Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ)”. GRADE–CERQual method of assessment will be used to assess confidence in the evidence of the qualitative research. The critical themes on facilitators and barriers which will be developed in this study will help to plan context specific interventions under National Tuberculosis Elimination Program to accelerate efforts towards the target of tuberculosis elimination in India.
Keywords:
Tuberculosis, TB Elimination, qualitative meta-synthesis, health system, NTEPReferences
Jameson JL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Loscalzo J. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine.20th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill:2020
Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease, 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders. 2022
World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis report 2023. [Internet]. [cited on 2024 Apr 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports
MoHFW, Govt of India. NTEP, Central TB division [Internet]. 2024. [cited on 2024 Apr 8]. Available from: https://tbcindia.gov.in/
MoHFW, Govt of India. India Tuberculosis report 2023, Central TB Division [Internet]. 2024. [cited on 8th April 2024]. Available from: https://tbcindia.gov.in/showfile.
CDC. Concepts of elimination. Centre for Disease Control [Internet]. [cited on 2024 Apr 8]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su48a7.htm
Shringarpure K, Gurumurthy M, Sagili KD, Taylor M, Garner P, Tonsing J, Rao R, Sachdeva KS. Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment in the Indian subcontinent: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. BMJ Open. 2023;13(5):e063926.
Sandelowski M, Barroso J, and Volis C I. Using qualitative meta-summary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Research in nursing and health. 2007;30(1):99-111.
Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing Qualitative Research New York. Springer. 2007.
Prospective Register of Systemic Reviews. [Internet]. 2024. [cited on 6th May 2024]. Available from: https://www.crd.york,ac.uk/prospero/
Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research : 2012.22(10):435-43:
Moher D , Liberati,A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, D G, and the PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7),. e1000097:2009
Booth A. Brimful of STARLITE: toward standards for reporting literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2006;94(4):421-e205
Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181.
Baumeister RF, Leary MR. Writing narrative literature reviews. Rev Gen Psychol.1997 3:311-320
Lachal J, Revah-Levy, A, Orri, M, and Moro, M R. Meta synthesis: An Original Method to synthesize Qualitative Literature in Psychiatry. Frontiers in psychiatry. 8,269:2017
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP (insert name of checklist i e, Qualitative) Checklist [Internet]. 2024. [cited on 29th May 2024]. Available at https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45.
Weed M. A potential method for the interpretative synthesis of qualitative research. issues in the development of ‘meta-interpretation’ International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2008;11(1):13-28.
Boeije H, Wesel, V. Making a difference: towards a method for weighing the evidence in a qualitative synthesis. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2011;4:19.
Schreiber, R, Crooks, D, and Stern, P N (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis; In J M Morse (Ed), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue. SAGE. 1997:311-326.
Timulak,L , Creaner, M. Essentials of Qualitative Meta-Analysis. American Psychological Association. 2023:9.
Levitt H M. How to conduct a qualitative meta analysis: Tailoring methods to enhance methodological integrity. Psychotherapy Research. 2018; 28(3):367 -378
Noblit, G W, Hare ,R D. Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage.1988.
Kearny, M H. Ready to wear: Discovering grounded formal theory. Research in nursing health.2001;21(2):179-186.
Paterson B L, Thorne S E , Canam C and Jillings C. Meta study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta synthesis. Sage. 2007.
Methley A M, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, and Cheraghi-Sohi S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER:A comparision study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative and systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:579.
Noyes J, Popay J. Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: how can a systematic review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative meta-synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(3):227-43.
Oga-Omenka C, Wakdet L, Menzies D, Zarowsky C. A qualitative meta-synthesis of facilitators and barriers to tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):279.
Rakesh PS, Shannawaz M, Mathew ME,Sachdeva KS. Facilitators and Barriers for Private health sector engagement for TB care in India: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024;12(4):e2400034.
Prisma flow diagram. [Internet]. 2024. [cited on 2024 Sep 12]. Available from: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram
ISOQ. Epistemonikos.org [internet] 2025. [cited on 2025 Jan 17]. Available from: https://isoq.epistemonikos.org/
Gandhi AP, Deshmukh P, Dongre AR. Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Applications, Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities. The Evidence. 2025.
Flemming K, Booth A, Garside R, Tunçalp Ö, Noyes J. Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods. BMJ Glob Heal. 2019;4:e000882.
Lewin K. Force Field Analysis, In: Handbook of Organization Development, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1951.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sahana. P.G, Amol R Dongre, Aravind P Gandhi, Pradeep Ramrao Deshmukh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright© by the author(s). Published by the Evidence Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
