Abstract
In times of machine intelligence evidence and truth take on new meaning as an orientation in a constructed reality. Large language moduls as used in machine learning are designed for simulation and deception. An electronic network that is suitable for imitating human language logic provides most of the properties to perfect lies. Lies are very much based on rationality and logic. Dichotomous thinking creates the polarity between the extremes of truth and untruth. While truth is immutably derived from the application of established laws and regulations evidence arises from the distinction between the probabilities of right and wrong or adequate and inadequate. Social conventions regulate many interhuman relationships in which we have to be able to rely on each other. In terms of social development, we have learned to live with compromises related to honesty. Direct lying remains socially unacceptable but concealment, deception and misleading are common means of competition. Although, peaceful and tolerant coexistence in the community is based on trust, lies are prevalent in the human society. Dealing openly with the topic allows to recognize how large and comprehensive the influence of lying within a community is. Rather than feeling a false sense of certainty it is better to use common sense and to estimate the probability of potential uncertainty. It remains to be hoped that the new machine intelligence can also be used to check data quality and provide precise information about data truthworthiness.
Keywords:
Bioethics, deception, ethics, professional, research, philosophy, medical, truth-tellingReferences
Peirce, C S. Collected Papers. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge; 1958–1966 [1866]. VI:220–237.
Bhaskar R. Critical realism and the ontology of persons. Journal of Critical Realism. 2020;19(2):1-8.
Smith D L. Why We Lie: The Evolutionary Roots of Deception and the Unconscious
Mind, New York: St. Martin's Press. 2004.
Lederer W. Ambiguity-based evidence. Hektoen International 2014;6(1).
Nietzsche F. On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense. In The Portable Nietzsche. New York: Penguin Books; 1982.
The Definition of Lying and Deception. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lying-definition; 2008. Accessed on 12 June 2024.
Gadamer H G. Truth and method. Basics of a philosophical hermeneutics [Wahrheit und
Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik], Mohr J c B & Siebeck P,
Tübingen, Germany. 1990
James W. The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to “Pragmatism”, New York and London: Longmans, Green & Co.; reprinted Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1975.
The Pragmatic Theory of Truth. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/ENTRIES/truth-pragmatic; 2019. Accessed 27 September 2024.
Wittgenstein L. On certainty [Über Gewissheit]. Ed. GEM Anscombe and GH Wright, tranl. By D Paul and GEM Anscombe, Basil Blackwell, Oxford; 1969.
Wittgenstein L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Cambridge; 1974.
Popper K R. The growth of scientific knowledge. In Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & K. Paul; 1963.
Lederer W. Science between evidence and illusion. The Evidence. 2024;2(3): 1-1
https://doi.org/10.61505/evidence.2024.2.3.95
Huizinga J. From the origin of culure in the game. In Homo ludens, ed.: Flitner A. Rowohlt Verlag, Reinbek; 2009. ISBN 978-3-499-55435-3.
Kant I. [1788]. Collected writings [Gesammelte Schriften] publ.: Academy of Sciences, Berlin; 1900.
Holms S. Not just autonomy-the principles of American biomedical ethics, Journal of Medical Ethics. 1995; 21:332-338.
Cartwright N. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford, online edn, Oxford Academics. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198247044.001.0001; 1983. Accessed 20 July 2024.
Lederer W. The paradox of Reviewer Accuracy. Journal of Philosophy and Ethics. 2024 6(1):45-8. DOI: 10.22259/2642-8415.0601005
Gödel K. 1931. On formally undecidable theorems of the Principia Mathematica and related systems I. [Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I]. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik. 1931;38:173-198. DOI:10.1007/BF01700692
Chatfield K, Law E. 2024. I should do what?’ Addressing research misconduct through values alignment. Research Ethics. 2024;20(2):251-271. DOI:10.1177/17470161231224481
Adorno T W. Introduction to sociology [Einleitung in die Soziologie], Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, ISBN 3-518-58167-8. 1993;157.
Descartes R. Meditationes de prima philosophia in qua dei existenti et animae immortalitas demonstrater / Meditations on first philosophy (Meditationen über die Erste Philosophie). Ed. C. Wohlers, Felix Meiner Verlag Hamburg, 2008.
Rimban E L. Sequential Thought versus Nonlinear Thought Prolegomenon to Nonlinear Metaphysics. Journal of Philosophy and Ethics. 2023;4(1):11-16. DOI:10.22259/2642-8415.0401002
Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN. 9780374533557. 2011.
Žižek S. 2013. Less than nothing: Hegel and The Shadow of dialectical materialism. Verso. 2013.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Wolfgang Lederer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright© by the author(s). Published by the Evidence Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Wolfgang Lederer, Science between evidence and illusion , The Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): JUL - SEP