Abstract

Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) is an upcoming field that focuses on the evolution of intelligent machines which can easily perform labor intensive tasks with great accuracy.  It has the ability to promptly analyze large amounts of data in a short span of time due to which it has been used for pathogen identification, and to make predictions regarding culture plate interpretations in a clinical specimen. This study reviews AI’s impact on clinical microbiology, focusing on microorganism identification, antimicrobial resistance detection, drug development, and record management, while highlighting key challenges.

Methods
A systematic review was conducted until June 1, 2024 by searching literature from various databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and manual search using keywords ‘AI and clinical microbiology’, ‘AI and diagnostic microbiology’, ‘AI and microscopy’, ‘AI and antimicrobial resistance’. Only the articles focusing on the use of AI in clinical or diagnostic microbiology were included and others were excluded. As the involvement of AI in clinical microbiology is a relatively recent and upcoming modality, majority of the selected articles were published in the last 5 years only.

Results
AI algorithms can be used for pathogen identification, bacterial growth detection, microscopy, colony counting, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and maintenance of electronic records in a clinical microbiology laboratory. This review focuses on the various AI algorithms that are relevant for clinical microbiology, some of which have already been used in pilot studies in many developed countries.

Conclusion
With the increasing number of publications on the use of AI in clinical microbiology, education and training regarding these technological advancements has become indispensable.

Keywords:

Algorithm, artificial intelligence, clinical microbiology , deep learning, machine learning, neural networks

References

Mishra A, Khan S, Das A, Das BC. Evolution of diagnostic and forensic microbiology in the era of artificial intelligence. Cureus 2023;15 (9): 45738.

Gammel N, Ross TL, Lewis S, Olson M, Henciak S, Harris R, et al. Comparison of an automated plate assessment system (APAS independence) and artificial intelligence (AI) to manual plate reading of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus CHROMagar surveillance cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2021; 59(11): 10-128.

Glasson J, Hill R, Summerford M, Giglio S. Observations on variations in manual reading of cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54(11): 2841.

DeYoung B, Morales M, Giglio S. Microbiology 2.0–A “behind the scenes” consideration for artificial intelligence applications for interpretive culture plate reading in routine diagnostic laboratories. Front Microbiol 2022; 13: 2898.

Feucherolles M, Nennig M, Becker SL, Martiny D, Losch S, Penny C, et al. Combination of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and machine learning for rapid antimicrobial resistance screening: The case of Campylobacter spp. Front microbiol 2022; 12:804484.

Rhoads DD. Computer vision and artificial intelligence are emerging diagnostic tools for the clinical microbiologist. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58(6):10-128.

Melo MC, Maasch JR, de la Fuente-Nunez C. Accelerating antibiotic discovery through artificial intelligence. Commun Biol 2021; 4(1):1050.

Sandle T. Enhancing rapid microbiology methods: how AI is shaping microbiology. Eur Pharm Rev 2021; 26(6): 38-40.

Petkidis A, Andriasyan V, Greber UF. Machine learning for cross-scale microscopy of viruses. Cell Rep Methods 2023; 3:100557.

Alouani DJ, Ransom EM, Jani M, Burnham CA, Rhoads DD, Sadri N. Deep convolutional neural networks implementation for the analysis of urine culture. Clin Chem 2022; 68(4): 574-83.

Fjell CD, Jenssen H, Hilpert K, Cheung WA, Panté N, Hancock RE, et al. Identification of novel antibacterial peptides by chemoinformatics and machine learning. J Med Chem 2009; 52(7): 2006-15.

Khaledi A, Weimann A, Schniederjans M, Asgari E, Kuo TH, Oliver A, et al. Predicting antimicrobial resistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa with machine learning-enabled molecular diagnostics. EMBO Mol Med 2020; 12(3): e10264. Doi:10.15252/emmm. 201910264.Epub2020 Feb 12. PMID: 32048461; PMCID: PMC7059009.

The United States Food and Drug Administration. Good Machine Learning Practice for Medical Device Development: Guiding Principles. 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/good-machine-learning-ptractice-medical-device-development-guiding-principles. Accessed May 28. 2024.

Leo S, Cherkaoui A, Renzi G, Schrenzel J. Mini review: clinical routine microbiology in the era of automation and digital health. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10:582028.

Barman RK, Mukhopadhyay A, Maulik U, Das S. Identification of infectious disease-associated host genes using machine learning techniques. BMC Bioinf 2019; 20: 736. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3317-0

Baker J, Timm K, Faron M, Ledeboer N, Culbreath K. Digital image analysis for the detection of Group B Streptococcus from ChromID Strepto B medium using PhenoMatrix algorithms. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 59(1): 10-128.

Van TT, Mata K, Dien Bard J. Automated detection of Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis by use of Colorex Strep A CHROMagar and WASPLab artificial intelligence chromogenic detection module software. J Clin Microbiol 2019; 57(11):10-128.

Smith KP, Kang AD, Kirby JE. Automated interpretation of blood culture gram stains by use of a deep convolutional neural network. J Clin Microbiol 2018; 56(3):10-128.

Pape C, Remme R, Wolny A, Olberg S, Wolf S, Cerrone L, et al. Microscopy‐based assay for semi‐quantitative detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 specific antibodies in human sera: A semi‐quantitative, high throughput, microscopy‐based assay expands existing approaches to measure SARS‐CoV‐2 specific antibody levels in human sera. Bioessays 2021; 43(3): 2000257.

Jiang S, Chan CN, Rovira-Clavé X, Chen H, Bai Y, Zhu B, et al. Combined protein and nucleic acid imaging reveals virus-dependent B cell and macrophage immunosuppression of tissue microenvironments. Immunity 2022; 55(6): 1118-34.

Lee JY, Wing PAC, Gala DS, Noerenberg M, Järvelin AI, Titlow J, et al. Absolute quantitation of individual SARS-CoV-2 RNA molecules provides a new paradigm for infection dynamics and variant differences. Elife 2022; 11: e74153.

Kratzel A, Kelly JN, V’kovski P, Portmann J, Brüggemann Y, Todt D, et al. A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies interactors of the autophagy pathway as conserved coronavirus targets. PLoS Biol 2021;19(12): e3001490.

Mathison BA, Kohan JL, Walker JF, Smith RB, Ardon O, Couturier MR. Detection of intestinal protozoa in trichrome-stained stool specimens by use of a deep convolutional neural network. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58(6): 10-128.

Khan M, Gentile N, Zhou YS, B A, Yen E. An audit of stool ova and parasite (O&P) testing in a multi-hospital health system. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: S429-30.

Racsa LD, Gander RM, Southern PM, McElvania TeKippe E, Doern C, Luu HS. Detection of intracellular parasites by use of the CellaVision DM96 analyzer during routine screening of peripheral blood smears. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53(1): 167-71.

Wong F, Zheng EJ, Valeri JA, Donghia NM, Anahtar MN, Omori S, et al. Discovery of a structural class of antibiotics with explainable deep learning. Nature 2024; 626:177-85.

Nguyen M, Long SW, McDermott PF, Olsen RJ, Olson R, Stevens RL, et al. Using machine learning to predict antimicrobial mics and associated genomic features for nontyphoidal Salmonella. J Clin Microbiol 2019; 57(2): 10-128.

Fader RC, Weaver E, Fossett R, Toyras M, Vanderlaan J, Gibbs D, et al. Multilaboratory study of the biomic automated well-reading instrument versus MicroScan WalkAway for reading MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility and identification panels. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51(5): 1548-54.

Cherkaoui A, Renzi G, Fischer A, Azam N, Schorderet D, Vuilleumier N, et al. Comparison of the Copan WASPLab incorporating the BioRad expert system against the SIRscan 2000 automatic for routine antimicrobial disc diffusion susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26(5): 619-25.

Faron ML, Buchan BW, Vismara C, Lacchini C, Bielli A, Gesu G, et al. Automated scoring of chromogenic media for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by use of WASPLab image analysis software. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54(3): 620-4.

Faron ML, Buchan BW, Coon C, Liebregts T, van Bree A, Jansz AR, et al. Automatic digital analysis of chromogenic media for vancomycin-resistant-Enterococcus screens using Copan WASPLab. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54(10): 2464-9.

Panicker RO, Soman B, Saini G, Rajan J. A review of automatic methods based on image processing techniques for tuberculosis detection from microscopic sputum smear images. J Med Syst 2016; 40:1-3.

Zingue D, Weber P, Soltani F, Raoult D, Drancourt M. Automatic microscopic detection of mycobacteria in sputum: a proof-of-concept. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 11308.

Prasad K, Winter J, Bhat UM, Acharya RV, Prabhu GK. Image analysis approach for development of a decision support system for detection of malaria parasites in thin blood smear images. J Digit Imaging 2012; 25: 542-9.

Kuo PC, Cheng HY, Chen PF, Liu YL, Kang M, Kuo MC, et al. Assessment of expert-level automated detection of Plasmodium falciparum in digitized thin blood smear images. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3(2): e200206.

Poostchi M, Silamut K, Maude RJ, Jaeger S, Thoma G. Image analysis and machine learning for detecting malaria. Transl Res 2018; 194: 36-55.

Peiffer-Smadja N, Dellière S, Rodriguez C, Birgand G, Lescure FX, Fourati S, et al. Machine learning in the clinical microbiology laboratory: has the time come for routine practice? Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26(10): 1300-9.

Croxatto A, Prod'hom G, Faverjon F, Rochais Y, Greub G. Laboratory automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose? Clin Microbiol Infect 2016; 22(3): 217-35.

Fox A. HCA deploys AI from Augmedix for acute care documentation in Eds. Healthcare IT News. April 25, 2025. Available from: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/hca-deploys-ai-augmedix-acute-care-documentation-eds Accessed May 6, 2024.

Medsphere Systems corporation. Medsphere adds CloudMedx Artificial Intelligence to CareVue HER Platform [Press Release]. Carlsbad, California. July 9, 2019. Available from: https://www.medsphere.com/blog/medsphere-adds-cloudmedx-artificial-intelligence-to-carevue-ehr-platform/ Accessed May 10, 2024.

Aquino S. How healthcare firm Regard uses Artificial Intelligence to usher medicine into modern age. Forbes. Jan 19, 2023. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenaquino/2023/01/19/how-healthcare-firm-regard-uses-artificial-intelligence-to-usher-medicine-into-the-modern-age/ Accessed May 12, 2024.

How to Cite

Drishti Sagar, Smriti Srivastava, & Priyanka Banerjee. (2024). Evolution of clinical and diagnostic microbiology in the era of artificial intelligence: a narrative review. The Evidence, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.61505/evidence.2024.2.4.106

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Dr Drishti Sagar, Dr Smriti Srivastava, Dr Priyanka Banerjee

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright© by the author(s). Published by the Evidence Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.